In the last legislature and following an agenda which by then was suspected, but now know that was carefully premeditated murder by the band eta and the PSOE, the Parliament adopted a declaration authorizing the Government to initiate contact with terrorists.
statement was really so worthless as to its formal declarative value, because the contacts were previous PSOE even the return of the Government, so as Rodriguez Zapatero took office as President, eta contacts. - Government of Spain were automatic without prior authorization by parliament.
The PSOE wanted to give democratic support the current negotiations and make way for voters Paripe less submissive to nationalism were accepting violent clear line between socialism and "violent nationalism."
Parliament giving the government permission, as if Spain was a country in which the separation of powers and the Congress of Deputies was not the go-between the executive through the partitocracy .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/523cb/523cb85a49920784b46da74dacdaa8a413dec39a" alt=""
Now, it is essential that the only party that aspires to be an alternative government (the PP) or the one who makes the opposition work (UPyD) request that Parliament itself revoke that permission. Not only that, is necessary to go further and promote a statement denying the possibility the government to negotiate with murderers organized.
Clearly, the proposal will not succeed (in fact, a similar and was torpedoed after the last election) but at least the PSOE and others will be forced to portray and to refuse to approve the motion, the cost may be political and electoral difficult to repeat this ominous negotiation.
The current English democracy gives too few instruments for the protection and promotion of an ethical mode of governance. The few remaining are, must be squeezed to the maximum but usually all they do is stir the media and perhaps some electoral clout, but is there anything they care about most politicians who suffer?
Moreover, any prohibition of Parliament would be able to be much stronger if unlikely event a change of government, for the PP not to commit which was the worst mistake of Aznar in his 8 year presidency . It was this mistake that gave wings to Zapatero and allowed him to accuse the PP of wanting to sabotage "the opportunity for peace", identifying the negotiating process eta PSOE. with what happened in the first term Aznar. Do not subtract one iota of responsibility to ZP, but we must make clear that the PP made it easy or at least it did everything it could have been to avoid the goings of the current President.
Because it was the PP, but the social pressure for much of the English people (for whom the PP was more an inconvenience than a help) who managed derail the negotiation process making that part of socialist voters feel uncomfortable with continuous assignments and teasing of ZP to so-called "nationalist environment, which is only the periphery of the murder as an instrument of pressure.
electoral cost analysis Strategists for the PSOE was what stopped the bleeding of government assignments, curiously mixed in an incredible way the vileness and ingenuity . The naivety to believe that ETA would end up giving up everything to settle for a most humiliating for Spain and the vileness the coldness of the systematic betrayal democracy, the PSOE its members killed, including.
In this term, economic issues are predominant. But there are more important issues. As for me, prefer a five-year crisis that a new negotiation with eta Overall, the first is inevitable and the second depends on each individual citizen, and that no political party can save us from it.
To explain: the VAT hike and the result is accumulated debt. If that debt also is directed primarily to subsidize areas close to power or directly unproductive to be maintained by those who do produce in order to keep bags of votes, it is obvious that from a liberal point of view that cause rejection, and in my If I'm going further: disgusts me.
If that makes me put the etiquetita of "evil liberal", because hey, I did not lose any sleep, much worse than I have been called. In fact, with your permission, my ideas and I go to sleep soundly.
Greetings.
(sorry if this was something "chop", but that was after twelve o'clock and I saw he was not going to get anything useful to the conversation.)
Colophon:
Man .., best of all would be dedicated to save banks, whether man, such that absolute predictability and effective teams neoliberal economists were all so clear the crisis was coming, they decided to give credit to the first passing through the door so as not to lose market ... Aided all is said by the Governor of the Bank of Spain, it now sees no choice but to free dismissal to fix the mess ... Have you value even opening the mouth of the perfect knowing failure of the economy without control has brought us this far, and above is still permissible to continue to provide the gibberish junk usual terminology is definitely something that cries to heaven.
you not look both more Debt + Taxes + Benefits + Stories, man ....,
Look at all those who have fallen in the street with one hand in front and another behind, which are people do you know? Are not numbers, and at least at least entitled to some of the state, because they also are not to blame for the disasters of an economic system where there is mangancia retirees billionaire bankers, international speculators, stock brokers and similar animals, and allow some of that money to the effort of all will come out, and not the other pocket.
Final (for now ...):
already part of my grant money (most forcibly and without choice) and I have the luck to keep my work and no pay little tax. It seems that for you, we pay more. Is very easy to pay more to the tax voluntarily, but that efforts to make others pay is certainly not an example of tolerance and respect for freedom (and money) of others. Funny
how to repeat the smears more topical and void on liberalism:
1) have created a crisis: you have to throw imagination when it is generated in two sectors as state and operated as the financial and real estate. The supply of land and housing in Spain and in many other countries is not free or anything, always decided by the authorities, do not tell me you did not know if enough to read. On the banks, where to look who else has criticized the bailout of them are liberal economists and intellectuals. And in Spain it has a socialist government, the press has barely said anything related. Can you imagine what that rescue would have said if is carried out by a government that was not the PSOE?
If you know what I think about it I invite you to read this link
http://desde-el-laberinto.
2) After you speak of money to be given to others . That is, think about sharing wealth but not create it. Typical of most old-fashioned socialism and impoverishing. It looks at what he said IMSERSO travel, which I consider to be a good example of waste. But also, you only think about charity. It is only fair that those retirees would choose what to do with the money generated by their work and not be paying them a pension that we work now. That is, just what is a funded system of pensions. As we crossed into facebook, I attach the link to the web in the same network where it is explained (I encourage you to read without prejudice) and why this system is much more cost effective and ethical than the current:
http://www.facebook.com/?r
3) Liberalism is ethically perverse. Just happened. According to you, liberals treat people as numbers. Look, I do not need doubt his good will, no doubt ponder on who wants the best for their peers, as if liberals do you do with the speaker, that look more like the evil villains of a short story for children. I understand that this childish vision is comfortable, the world is easier if we paint it all black and white and we are always on the side of good. Do you think that I have loved ones in the severe unemployment or economic hardship? From what blinding prejudices nebula can prejudge without knowing the values \u200b\u200band principles of those who profess an ideology that you show ignorance and just have the same distorted references typical of a bad movie script Hollywood?
I have no intention to bother you intellectually in which it seems your comfortable stay in the Manichean division of reality, but if one dares to take up the healthy habit of doubt, I will allow the excess to recommend a short book "Principles liberal" Dario Antiseri. Yes, be careful not to give you a anaphylactic shock.
http://www.diariosigloxxi.
9012 Greetings and good night.
( Yes, I put a television spot on my blog, do you spend something? ;)).
Anyway, this is l or there "out there." For the little but very good who read this blog, as liberals, have you no sense on many occasions and have spoken a hundred times with a person whom you had never let you cross? How is it possible that they are so similar to each other illiberal?